[July 2013]
The difference in Constitutional amendment process between Australia and Japan

As I reported before, there are discussions about the referendum for Constitutional recognition of local government, altering section 96 of the Australian Constitution.

As it happens, there are also discussions whether section 96 of the Constitution of Japan should be altered or not. Section 96 of the Japanese Constitution states that amendments shall be initiated by the Diet (Parliament), through a concurring vote of two-thirds or more of all the members of each House and shall thereupon be submitted to the people for ratification, which shall require a yes vote of a majority of all votes cast.

無題4
The Japanese Constitution is categorised as relatively solid compared with those of other countries. We have never experienced attempts to alter the Constitution. On the other hand, in Australia, there have been 44 attempts to amend the Constitution, of which eight have been successful.

From a Japanese perspective, it is interesting that a double majority (a majority of states and a majority of voters) is required in Australia for electors to approve altering of the Constitution.

The difference in Constitutional amendment processes shows the basic difference in national structure between a unitary and federal system.

Posted in From the Executive Director

Uncategorised

  • The latest issue of our correspondence is released.

    View this correspondence in PDF.

     

  • The latest issue of our correspondence is released.

    View this Correspondence in PDF.

  • The latest issue of our correspondence is released.

    View this Correspondence in PDF.

  • The latest issue of our correspondence is released.

    View this Correspondence in PDF.

  • The latest issue of our correspondence is released.

    View this Correspondence in PDF.

  • To investigate environmental countermeasures, a student and her chaperone from Hikone Technological High School of Shiga Prefecture visited Australia from late July to early August. CLAIR Sydney conducted a briefing on 29 July about Australia’s culture and customs, and accompanied the group to a company visit in Brisbane on 31 July, where the company, known for producing products using a type of seaweed called Asparagopsis, shared insights into their research and production processes.

    During the visit, they received information on efforts to reduce methane emissions from livestock using Asparagopsis, viewed from a carbon-neutral perspective. The student’s proactive participation in the meetings, driven by a desire to engage in environmental initiatives in the future, was impressive.

    In addition to the briefing and accompaniment, we also reached out to the company to request a representative to discuss their Asparagopsis research. CLAIR Sydney will continue to support the activities of Japanese local governments conducting research on topics related to Australia.

  • The latest issue of our correspondence is released.

    View this Correspondence in PDF.

  • 01_Participant Application Form

    02_Outline of the Local Government Exchange and Cooperation Seminar 2024

  • The latest issue of our correspondence is released.

    View this Correspondence in PDF.

  • The latest issue of our correspondence is released.

    View this correspondence in PDF.